Spectral Identification: Difference between revisions
m Cliff's introduction |
m formatting |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I'm going to post the 10-word vocabulary I have been teaching here at Bose. "your rules" hit me funny, like it's my ball and you have to play this way or forget it. It's not like this is the script carved on the holy tablets by God, or whatnot. It's just an attempt, a proposal, for any rule where there really aren't any. I think that if we can at least agree on 10 words, it's a start. Actually, these words are a "middle man" to what we really need to do: Hear, listen (the combined activity of taking in audio information, thinking and concluding) and identify in real engineering terms. Like, for instance, a "nasal" quality is heard, the thought process says "aha, too much level in the 1KHz octave" and then you can do something about it, like reach for the 1KHz part of an equalizer and make it sound normal. The words describe familiar qualities we are all familiar with, many having to do with our knowledge of how normal human speech sounds. | I'm going to post the 10-word vocabulary I have been teaching here at Bose. "your rules" hit me funny, like it's my ball and you have to play this way or forget it. It's not like this is the script carved on the holy tablets by God, or whatnot. It's just an attempt, a proposal, for any rule where there really aren't any. I think that if we can at least agree on 10 words, it's a start. Actually, these words are a "middle man" to what we really need to do: Hear, listen (the combined activity of taking in audio information, thinking and concluding) and identify in real engineering terms. Like, for instance, a "nasal" quality is heard, the thought process says "aha, too much level in the 1KHz octave" and then you can do something about it, like reach for the 1KHz part of an equalizer and make it sound normal. The words describe familiar qualities we are all familiar with, many having to do with our knowledge of how normal human speech sounds. | ||
But, for this discussion, here are the 10 words, which describe a 1 octave excess level in the stated center of that octave (these are all "ISO standard center frequencies"). These can be used anywhere but hopefully for better communication about qualities about our system, for better or for worse: | |||
woofy (31Hz octave) | * woofy (31Hz octave) | ||
boomy (62 Hz octave) | * boomy (62 Hz octave) | ||
punchy (125 Hz octave) | * punchy (125 Hz octave) | ||
chesty (250 Hz octave) | * chesty (250 Hz octave) | ||
honky (500 Hz octave) | * honky (500 Hz octave) | ||
nasal (1000 Hz octave) | * nasal (1000 Hz octave) | ||
quacky (2000 Hz octave) | * quacky (2000 Hz octave) | ||
Shrill (4000 Hz, the most annoying octave to be accented) | * Shrill (4000 Hz, the most annoying octave to be accented) | ||
Spitty (8000 Hz octave) | * Spitty (8000 Hz octave) | ||
Air (16,000 Hz octave) | * Air (16,000 Hz octave) | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
Here are some cuts from Cliff's Spectral Identification disc. Personally, there have been a few key people here at Bose who have helped broaden my listening capabilities by teaching me how and what to listen to. Cliff is definitely one of those persons who have helped me tune my senses. I hope these tracks are as helpful to you as they were to me. In addition, also consider the audio ear training course from Dave Moulton called [http://www.moultonlabs.com/gold.htm" Golden Ears]. Although it's much more catered to the intricacies of recording music, it's very helpful in general (BTW it’s a lengthy 8 discs I think). Here goes with Cliff’s recordings... | |||
<html> | <html> | ||
<br><br><a href="http://bose.infopop.cc/eve/forums/a/ga/ul/3841037694/02._Track_2.mp3" target="_blank">Male voice</a>, 12dB boost, all 10 octaves, rapid play (1,070 KB, MP3) | <br><br><a href="http://bose.infopop.cc/eve/forums/a/ga/ul/3841037694/02._Track_2.mp3" target="_blank">Male voice</a>, 12dB boost, all 10 octaves, rapid play (1,070 KB, MP3) | ||