In Ear Monitors for an L1 User: Difference between revisions

mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 58: Line 58:




== Why UHF instead of 2.4 Mhz Digital ==
== Why UHF instead of 2.4 Mhz Digital? ==
If you're wondering why I went with a UHF system instead of one of the less expensive 2.4 MHz systems - it's because the 2.4 MHz range is crowded. I don't want to get to a gig and find that all the available channels are occupied by the ubiquitous wireless guitar and microphone systems. I may be wrong, but I think we're going to see some problems when all those players who got 2.4 Mhz wireless systems while we were locked down, show up on stage together for the first time.
If you're wondering why I went with a UHF system instead of one of the less expensive 2.4 MHz systems - it's because the 2.4 MHz range is crowded. I don't want to get to a gig and find that all the available channels are occupied by the ubiquitous wireless guitar and microphone systems. I may be wrong, but I predict there will problems when all those players who got 2.4 Mhz wireless systems while we were locked down, show up on stage together for the first time.


== Why the Twin System ==
== Why the Twin System ==