Review / Microphone / Various: Difference between revisions
→Application - Hand Held Microphone - Soloist: formatting |
|||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
=== Application - Hand Held Microphone - Soloist === | === Application - Hand Held Microphone - Soloist === | ||
# Neumann KMS105 | # Neumann KMS105 | ||
# AKG C535 | # AKG C535 | ||
# Rode S1 | # Rode S1 | ||
# Shure Beta 87a | # Shure Beta 87a | ||
| Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
The AKG C585, Rode S1 and the Shure Beta 87a sound very similar to me. Well defined, accurate, but lacking the lustre of the Neumann KMS105. | The AKG C585, Rode S1 and the Shure Beta 87a sound very similar to me. Well defined, accurate, but lacking the lustre of the Neumann KMS105. | ||
The AKG C585 comes ahead of the others because it has switches to provide -10 db attenuation and low frequency roll-off. This is good for controlling the proximity effect that occurs with condenser mics when you "eat" them. | The AKG C585 comes ahead of the others because it has switches to provide -10 db attenuation and low frequency roll-off. This is good for controlling the proximity effect that occurs with condenser mics when you "eat" them. | ||
The Shure Beta 87a is at the bottom of the list because, of all of the condenser microphones, it was the most difficult to control for feedback. This would be a concern in a hand-held situation. | The Shure Beta 87a is at the bottom of the list because, of all of the condenser microphones, it was the most difficult to control for feedback. This would be a concern in a hand-held situation. | ||
=== Application - On the Stand === | === Application - On the Stand === | ||