Localization Spaciousness Reverberation: Difference between revisions

first ed.
 
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
<!-- TODO Talk to Ken and Hilmar about a joint article on this. -->
Originally posted by Hilmar-at-Bose  
Originally posted by Hilmar-at-Bose  
<ref>[http://bose.infopop.cc/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/6806048934/m/4891042361/r/2051026361#2051026361 Hilmar-at-Bose in the Bose® Musicians Community Message Boards]</ref>
<ref>[http://bose.infopop.cc/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/6806048934/m/4891042361/r/2051026361#2051026361 Hilmar-at-Bose in the Bose® Musicians Community Message Boards]</ref>
Line 11: Line 13:
The main contributing factors for spaciousness are “early lateral reflections”. These are reflections from the sidewalls. Reflections from the side help quite a bit with creating a sense of space and envelopment. Reflection from the floor and ceiling are less desirable since they don’t enhance spaciousness but can negatively impact clarity and spectral balance. There are very interesting physiological reasons of why lateral reflections are perceived so much differently than vertical ones. I could drone on for hours on this topic, but I’ll save that for later. Anyway, it’s not too much of a surprise that most renowned concert halls (e.g. Musikvereinssaal in Vienna, Concertgebow in Amsterdam, or Boston Symphony Hall) have a “shoebox” shape that is long, narrow and tall. This shape provides good lateral reflections pretty much everywhere in the audience. Ironically, it’s not very popular with architects since the sight lines are terrible. Visually oriented architects prefer the “shell” shape, which provides great viewing but (unfortunately) no lateral reflections whatsoever. But I’m digressing again… The L1 does (in my humble opinion) the best thing. It radiates very wide horizontally but very little much towards the ceiling. Thus it provides enough energy for lateral reflections but keeps interfering ceiling reflections at bay. Since it’s a single source, it provides very easy and accurate localization, but in most venues the image will also be pleasantly spacious. That’s at least my own experience. - read it in context -
The main contributing factors for spaciousness are “early lateral reflections”. These are reflections from the sidewalls. Reflections from the side help quite a bit with creating a sense of space and envelopment. Reflection from the floor and ceiling are less desirable since they don’t enhance spaciousness but can negatively impact clarity and spectral balance. There are very interesting physiological reasons of why lateral reflections are perceived so much differently than vertical ones. I could drone on for hours on this topic, but I’ll save that for later. Anyway, it’s not too much of a surprise that most renowned concert halls (e.g. Musikvereinssaal in Vienna, Concertgebow in Amsterdam, or Boston Symphony Hall) have a “shoebox” shape that is long, narrow and tall. This shape provides good lateral reflections pretty much everywhere in the audience. Ironically, it’s not very popular with architects since the sight lines are terrible. Visually oriented architects prefer the “shell” shape, which provides great viewing but (unfortunately) no lateral reflections whatsoever. But I’m digressing again… The L1 does (in my humble opinion) the best thing. It radiates very wide horizontally but very little much towards the ceiling. Thus it provides enough energy for lateral reflections but keeps interfering ceiling reflections at bay. Since it’s a single source, it provides very easy and accurate localization, but in most venues the image will also be pleasantly spacious. That’s at least my own experience. - read it in context -


Originally posted by Ken-at-Bose <ref>[http://bose.infopop.cc/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/6806048934/m/4891042361/r/9411055461#9411055461 Ken-at-Bose in the Bose® Musicians Community Message Boards]</ref>
Originally posted by Ken-at-Bose <ref>[http://bose.infopop.cc/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/6806048934/m/4891042361/r/9411055461#9411055461 Ken-at-Bose in the Bose® Musicians Community Message Boards]</ref> (later in the same discussion):
(later in the same discussion):


What we perceive as "reverberance" is caused physically almost entirely by the persistence in time of an acoustic event.
What we perceive as "reverberance" is caused physically almost entirely by the persistence in time of an acoustic event.
Line 32: Line 33:
[[category:Concepts]]
[[category:Concepts]]
[[category:Terminology]]
[[category:Terminology]]
<!-- TODO
Talk to Ken and Hilmar about a joint article on this.
-->