L1® for Studio Monitoring: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I have been using the Classic since 2004 and the Model II since it came out. Either L1's flat response is perfect for | I have been using the Classic since 2004 and the Model II since it came out. Either L1's flat response is perfect for | ||
checking overall instrument tone and balance, especially the reverb balance. Multiple monitoring systems are typical in | checking overall instrument tone and balance, especially the reverb balance. Multiple monitoring systems are typical in | ||
studios, and the L1 is a fine cross reference tool, when used in conjunction with other | studios, and the L1 is a fine cross reference tool, when used in conjunction with other <a href="http://www.mackie.com/products/hrmk2series">nearfield monitors.</a> | ||
It's use in the studio as a PA monitor during tracking and dubbing sessions is also substantial. The L1 frees us from | It's use in the studio as a PA monitor during tracking and dubbing sessions is also substantial. The L1 frees us from | ||