Review / Microphone / Various: Difference between revisions

Line 71:

<div>

===Dynamic ===

* [[Sennheiser MD 435]] $619

* [[Sennheiser MD 445]] $619

** [https://sennheiser.com/mm-445 Wireless Capsule Sennheiser MM 445] $619

* [[Sennheiser MD 435]] $619

* [[Beyerdynamic M88 N(c)]] $499

* [https://www.shure.com/en-US/products/microphones/beta_58a Shure Beta 58a] $300

* [http://www.audixusa.com/Acrobat/OM5_spec_sheet.pdf Audix OM5] $265

* [https://products.electrovoice.com/na/en/nd767a EV N/D767a] $150

</div>

Line 105:

Line 106:

* Shure Beta 58a

* Audix OM5

* EV N/D767a

See the section at the end (Testing) for details about how I tested.

Line 117:

Line 119:

# Beyerdynamic M88

# Audix OM5

# EV N/D767a

# Shure Beta 58a

Line 127:

Line 130:

The Audix OM5 sounds good, has a tight hypercardioid polar pattern, and there is a ToneMatch Preset for it.

The Shure Beta 58a is a fine upgrade from a Shure SM 58 (cardioid polar pattern). ~~However~~, the others on the list sound better to me.

The EV N/D767a is a terrific microphone, supercardioid polar pattern, and there is a ToneMatch Preset for it. It was a bargain before they were discontinued about five years ago.

The Shure Beta 58a is a fine upgrade from a Shure SM 58 (cardioid polar pattern). I have several of these on hand for vocalists who insist on using a Shure microphone. I put them through their paces in a recent review. While I understand their popularity, the others on the list sound better to me.

=== Application - Soloist ===

@@ Line 71: / Line 71: @@
 <div>
 ===Dynamic ===
-* [[Sennheiser MD 435]] $619
 * [[Sennheiser MD 445]] $619
 ** [https://sennheiser.com/mm-445 Wireless Capsule Sennheiser MM 445] $619
+* [[Sennheiser MD 435]] $619
 * [[Beyerdynamic M88 N(c)]] $499
 * [https://www.shure.com/en-US/products/microphones/beta_58a Shure Beta 58a] $300
 * [http://www.audixusa.com/Acrobat/OM5_spec_sheet.pdf Audix OM5] $265
+* [https://products.electrovoice.com/na/en/nd767a EV N/D767a] $150
 </div>
 <div style="border-style: solid;  border-width: 1px; border-radius: 15px; padding-left: 20px;">
@@ Line 105: / Line 106: @@
 * Shure Beta 58a
 * Audix OM5
+* EV N/D767a
 See the section at the end (Testing) for details about how I tested.
@@ Line 117: / Line 119: @@
 # Beyerdynamic M88
 # Audix OM5
+# EV N/D767a
 # Shure Beta 58a
@@ Line 127: / Line 130: @@
 The Audix OM5 sounds good, has a tight hypercardioid polar pattern, and there is a ToneMatch Preset for it.
-The Shure Beta 58a is a fine upgrade from a Shure SM 58 (cardioid polar pattern). However, the others on the list sound better to me.
+The EV N/D767a is a terrific microphone, supercardioid polar pattern, and there is a ToneMatch Preset for it. It was a bargain before they were discontinued about five years ago.
+The Shure Beta 58a is a fine upgrade from a Shure SM 58 (cardioid polar pattern). I have several of these on hand for vocalists who insist on using a Shure microphone. I put them through their paces in a recent review. While I understand their popularity, the others on the list sound better to me.
 === Application - Soloist ===