Review / Microphone / Various: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
=== Condenser === | === Condenser === | ||
* [https://en-de.neumann.com/kms-105 Neumann KMS 105] $799 | * [https://en-de.neumann.com/kms-105 Neumann KMS 105] $799 | ||
* [http://rodemicrophones.com/S1WhatsNew.htm Rode S1] $599 | * [http://rodemicrophones.com/S1WhatsNew.htm Rode S1] $599 | ||
| Line 57: | Line 55: | ||
<div style="border-style: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 15px; padding-left: 20px;"> | <div style="border-style: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 15px; padding-left: 20px;"> | ||
== Studio Microphones == | == Studio Microphones == | ||
* [[Sony_C48_Microphone|Sony C48]] $1675 | |||
* [http://www.microtechgefell.de/index.php/en/microphones/studio-a-recording/large-membrane-transistor-mics/202-umt-70s Microtech Geffel UMT 70S] [http://www.microtechgefell.de/index.php/en/general-terms-and-conditions/doc_download/12-umt70s-english pdf file] $1,600 | |||
I used the Sony C48 and the Microtech Geffel UMT 70S for baseline reference. These large-diaphragm condenser microphones with switchable patterns; Omni, cardioid, hyper-cardioid, and figure 8. The Microtech Geffel sounds similar to a Neumann U87. It is rumoured that they use the same capsule. | I used the Sony C48 and the Microtech Geffel UMT 70S for baseline reference. These large-diaphragm condenser microphones with switchable patterns; Omni, cardioid, hyper-cardioid, and figure 8. The Microtech Geffel sounds similar to a Neumann U87. It is rumoured that they use the same capsule. | ||
I would not recommend these for frequent live applications. Neither is suited for hand-held use. <!-- They are better suited for recording given their relatively fragile nature. However, if you don't mind treating them with care, I would use these for an ensemble where you want to use a single microphone. Here, the switchable pattern (omnidirectional) might do very well. | I would not recommend these for frequent live applications. Neither is suited for hand-held use. <!-- They are better suited for recording given their relatively fragile nature. However, if you don't mind treating them with care, I would use these for an ensemble where you want to use a single microphone. Here, the switchable pattern (omnidirectional) might do very well. | ||