Review / Microphone / Various: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<!-- | |||
This leaves for comparison | This leaves for comparison | ||
| Line 81: | Line 82: | ||
See the section at the end (Testing) for details about how I tested. | See the section at the end (Testing) for details about how I tested. | ||
--> | |||
== Conclusions == | == Conclusions == | ||
Any of these remaining microphones will perform well with the {{L1 nl}}. Use the matching ToneMatch Preset and close microphone technique (lips brushing the windscreen). | |||
=== Application - High-Volume - Gain before Feedback === | === Application - High-Volume - Gain before Feedback === | ||
| Line 92: | Line 93: | ||
# Shure Beta 58a | # Shure Beta 58a | ||
For high-volume applications where gain before feedback is the priority, the Sennheiser MD 445 comes first. Sennheiser released this microphone in late 2020. It has an extremely tight supercardioid polar pattern. The [[Gain Before Feedback|gain before feedback]] sets it ahead of everything else on the list. It has a lift in the upper midrange and details in the highs that comes close to sounding like a good condenser microphone. | For high-volume applications where gain before feedback is the priority, the [[Sennheiser MD 445]] comes first. Sennheiser released this microphone in late 2020. It has an extremely tight supercardioid polar pattern. The [[Gain Before Feedback|gain before feedback]] sets it ahead of everything else on the list. It has a lift in the upper midrange and details in the highs that comes close to sounding like a good condenser microphone. This also helps me to project, compete, and be heard in a busy stage mix. | ||
The Audix OM5 sounds good, has a tight hypercardioid polar pattern, and there is a ToneMatch Preset for it. | The Audix OM5 sounds good, has a tight hypercardioid polar pattern, and there is a ToneMatch Preset for it. | ||