Review / Microphone / Various: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

VisualWikitext

Revision as of 03:12, 31 July 2021 view source ST (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators 20,075 edits mNo edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 03:13, 31 July 2021 view source ST (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators 20,075 edits mNo edit summary Newer edit →
Line 209:		Line 209:


	I'm still using the [http://www.neumann.com/?lang=en&id=current_microphones&cid=kms105_description Neumann ~~KMS105~~]. It is my vocal microphone.		I'm still using the [http://www.neumann.com/?lang=en&id=current_microphones&cid=kms105_description Neumann KMS 105]. It is my vocal microphone.

	I've used several other microphones that weren't available for the comparisons above. Today I would include the [https://www.shure.com/en-US/products/microphones/ksm9 Shure KSM9] among the top contenders for a stage-worthy condenser microphone. Having used both it's not a matter of one being better than the other. They are outstanding microphones. It comes down to person preference and the combination of the singer and microphone.		I've used several other microphones that weren't available for the comparisons above. Today I would include the [https://www.shure.com/en-US/products/microphones/ksm9 Shure KSM9] among the top contenders for a stage-worthy condenser microphone. Having used both it's not a matter of one being better than the other. They are outstanding microphones. It comes down to person preference and the combination of the singer and microphone.