In Ear Monitors for an L1 User: Difference between revisions

From Bose Portable PA Knowledge
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "== Research == === Articles and Discussions === [https://www.reddit.com/r/audioengineering/comments/8vdd5j/replacing_studio_monitors_with_inear_monitors/ Replacing Studio Mon..."
 
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
== Research ==
{{Editorial ST
 
|Author = [[User:ST]]
 
|discussion page = link to forum discussion (optional) e.g. discussion in the Bose Message Board
 
}}
 
[[File:Sennheiser EW IEM G4-TWIN.jpg|link=https://en-us.sennheiser.com/double-wireless-in-ear-monitor-system-live-sound-ew-iem-g4-twin|thumb]]
[https://en-us.sennheiser.com/double-wireless-in-ear-monitor-system-live-sound-ew-iem-g4-twin EW IEM G4 Twin]
I just got my In-Ear-Monitors. [[Sennheiser EW IEM G4]] - Double Wireless In-Ear-Monitor-System
 
I normally run my PA (Bose L1 behind me). I don't have separate monitors. I wanted to try in-ear-monitors for a change.
 
== First Time Setup ==
The Sennheiser system worked out of the box. I took time to get to learn the details several hours into the experience of hearing myself in this new way. I connected the headphone output of my {{ToneMatch mixer}} to the inputs of the transmitter to try things out quickly.
 
== First Impressions ==
;Guitar
The guitar through the [[Kemper Profiler]] sounds great through the in-ear-monitors, but to put that into context, I'm used to hearing it through my L1 Pro32. It's not massively different.
 
;Vocals
I usually run the vocals dry in the PA (no reverb or time-related effects) because there's usually plenty of natural reverberation in the room. That means the headphone mix is dry, too - drier than what I usually hear (voice in the room sound). That's okay. I don't mind.
 
It will take some time to get used to the occlusion effect (try singing with your fingers in your ears). The guitar sounds fine. My voice sounds funny. When I have more time, I'll set up a proper monitor mix to control the vocal and guitar levels separately.
 
I'll need to rehearse with the in-ear-monitors to get used to hearing myself that way.
 
== Later Impressions ==
Wow - I wish I had gotten wireless in-ear-monitors sooner.
 
Well, the best part is the wireless. Back when I had to consider the neighbours and cohabitants, I would occasionally play with headphones. I hated it - mostly because I play standing up and I wander around. Within minutes I was a tangled mess. You find out quickly if you tend to turn in one direction when there are cables involved. I went wireless for the guitar a long time ago, which made using headphones all the more vexing.
 
Remember the first time you played wireless with your guitar on stage? I got to relive that all over again with wireless monitoring.
 
I'm still getting used to the earbuds and the occlusion effect when I'm singing. When I want to give that a rest, I can use regular headphones.
 
The initial setup was drop-dead simple, but there are plenty of options, including a limiter so I won't blow out my ears.
 
== Why UHF instead of 2.4 Mhz Digital ==
If you're wondering why I went with a UHF system instead of one of the less expensive 2.4 MHz systems - it's because the 2.4 MHz range is crowded. I don't want to get to a gig and find that all the available channels are occupied by the ubiquitous wireless guitar and microphone systems.
 
== Why the Twin System ==
I got the package deal with two receivers for two reasons.
* The system is stereo, but you can split the signals and have two monitor mixes - one for each receiver
* You can run remote loudspeakers for larger venues in stereo or dual mono.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


=== Articles and Discussions ===
=== Articles and Discussions ===

Revision as of 03:04, 4 June 2021

This article expresses my opinion and experience. Please post comments link to forum discussion (optional) e.g. discussion in the Bose Message Board. Thank you — User:ST.


EW IEM G4 Twin I just got my In-Ear-Monitors. Sennheiser EW IEM G4 - Double Wireless In-Ear-Monitor-System

I normally run my PA (Bose L1 behind me). I don't have separate monitors. I wanted to try in-ear-monitors for a change.

First Time Setup

The Sennheiser system worked out of the box. I took time to get to learn the details several hours into the experience of hearing myself in this new way. I connected the headphone output of my Template:ToneMatch mixer to the inputs of the transmitter to try things out quickly.

First Impressions

Guitar

The guitar through the Kemper Profiler sounds great through the in-ear-monitors, but to put that into context, I'm used to hearing it through my L1 Pro32. It's not massively different.

Vocals

I usually run the vocals dry in the PA (no reverb or time-related effects) because there's usually plenty of natural reverberation in the room. That means the headphone mix is dry, too - drier than what I usually hear (voice in the room sound). That's okay. I don't mind.

It will take some time to get used to the occlusion effect (try singing with your fingers in your ears). The guitar sounds fine. My voice sounds funny. When I have more time, I'll set up a proper monitor mix to control the vocal and guitar levels separately.

I'll need to rehearse with the in-ear-monitors to get used to hearing myself that way.

Later Impressions

Wow - I wish I had gotten wireless in-ear-monitors sooner.

Well, the best part is the wireless. Back when I had to consider the neighbours and cohabitants, I would occasionally play with headphones. I hated it - mostly because I play standing up and I wander around. Within minutes I was a tangled mess. You find out quickly if you tend to turn in one direction when there are cables involved. I went wireless for the guitar a long time ago, which made using headphones all the more vexing.

Remember the first time you played wireless with your guitar on stage? I got to relive that all over again with wireless monitoring.

I'm still getting used to the earbuds and the occlusion effect when I'm singing. When I want to give that a rest, I can use regular headphones.

The initial setup was drop-dead simple, but there are plenty of options, including a limiter so I won't blow out my ears.

Why UHF instead of 2.4 Mhz Digital

If you're wondering why I went with a UHF system instead of one of the less expensive 2.4 MHz systems - it's because the 2.4 MHz range is crowded. I don't want to get to a gig and find that all the available channels are occupied by the ubiquitous wireless guitar and microphone systems.

Why the Twin System

I got the package deal with two receivers for two reasons.

  • The system is stereo, but you can split the signals and have two monitor mixes - one for each receiver
  • You can run remote loudspeakers for larger venues in stereo or dual mono.










Articles and Discussions

Replacing Studio Monitors with In Ear Monitors — Reddit