Feedback / Microphone: Difference between revisions
| Line 116: | Line 116: | ||
</details> | </details> | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
<div> | |||
Use a directional microphone. [[Microphone Directionality#Supercardioid_/_Hypercardioid|Hypercardioid]] is better than [[Microphone Directionality#Cardioid|cardioid]], which is better than [[Microphone Directionality#Omnidirectional Microphone|omnidirectional]]. All sound waves impinging on the microphone from a direction other than the intended signal is "noise" and will lower the threshold of feedback. | Use a directional microphone. [[Microphone Directionality#Supercardioid_/_Hypercardioid|Hypercardioid]] is better than [[Microphone Directionality#Cardioid|cardioid]], which is better than [[Microphone Directionality#Omnidirectional Microphone|omnidirectional]]. All sound waves impinging on the microphone from a direction other than the intended signal is "noise" and will lower the threshold of feedback. | ||
| Line 124: | Line 124: | ||
Conversely, an omnidirectional microphone (equal sensitivity to sound coming from any direction) has no proximity effect. This is an advantage often in the studio where the engineer wants consistent tone regardless of distance. But it's a disadvantage on stage in terms of feebdack. An omnidirectional mic collects more sound that's not the target, and because it has no proximity effect is more susceptible to feedback at low-to-mid frequencies than a directional mic. | Conversely, an omnidirectional microphone (equal sensitivity to sound coming from any direction) has no proximity effect. This is an advantage often in the studio where the engineer wants consistent tone regardless of distance. But it's a disadvantage on stage in terms of feebdack. An omnidirectional mic collects more sound that's not the target, and because it has no proximity effect is more susceptible to feedback at low-to-mid frequencies than a directional mic. | ||
</div> | |||
=== Effects === | === Effects === | ||