Review / Microphone / Various: Difference between revisions
m Epilogue |
|||
| Line 148: | Line 148: | ||
I've used several other microphones that weren't available for the comparisons above. Today I would include the [https://www.shure.com/en-US/products/microphones/ksm9 Shure KSM9] among the top contenders for a stage worthy condenser microphone. Having used both it's not a matter of one being better than the other. They are outstanding microphones. It comes down to person preference and the combination of the singer and microphone. | I've used several other microphones that weren't available for the comparisons above. Today I would include the [https://www.shure.com/en-US/products/microphones/ksm9 Shure KSM9] among the top contenders for a stage worthy condenser microphone. Having used both it's not a matter of one being better than the other. They are outstanding microphones. It comes down to person preference and the combination of the singer and microphone. | ||
One more comment about the Neumann KMS 105. It makes singing effortless. Of all the microphones I've used over the years, it is the easiest to sing into to get the sound I want to hear. That's not something I can identify quantitatively with specifications, but it's real and it makes a huge difference. The Shure KSM9 is very close in this regard. | |||
Since the introduction of the {{Compact}} and {{S1}} I've had to consider dynamic microphones because these two units do not provide phantom power required for my Neumann KMS 105. Today I would add these microphones to the comparisons of dynamic microphones. | Since the introduction of the {{Compact}} and {{S1}} I've had to consider dynamic microphones because these two units do not provide phantom power required for my Neumann KMS 105. Today I would add these microphones to the comparisons of dynamic microphones. | ||