Stereo / Mono / Distributed Systems: Difference between revisions
m →Mono |
|||
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
:Once you separate the sources by several or more wavelengths, the summations and cancellations are so numerous and so complex that we say the two sources are essentially uncorrelated (not strictly true, but for the purposes of this argument, a very close approximation.) When two sources are uncorrelated the only thing you can count on is that the total amount of acoustic power going into the room will be doubled. Doubling the power is 3 dB. | :Once you separate the sources by several or more wavelengths, the summations and cancellations are so numerous and so complex that we say the two sources are essentially uncorrelated (not strictly true, but for the purposes of this argument, a very close approximation.) When two sources are uncorrelated the only thing you can count on is that the total amount of acoustic power going into the room will be doubled. Doubling the power is 3 dB. | ||
:So what we've said is | :So what we've said is | ||
# put B1s together if you can because they'll give you an honest 6 dB per doubling of B1 systems; | |||
# if you are sending a mono or stereo signal to spaced L1 systems, try to space them 20' (7m) or more if you can because this will minimize any audible cancellations. | |||
:Alan, you've got enough spacing of your L1 systems and so I really don't see any problem with destructive interference. On the other hand, given the maximum benefit in level is only 3 dB, and you are somewhat reducing the clarity and accuracy of localization, I question the benefit. Your willingness to experiment is a good ingredient. | :Alan, you've got enough spacing of your L1 systems and so I really don't see any problem with destructive interference. On the other hand, given the maximum benefit in level is only 3 dB, and you are somewhat reducing the clarity and accuracy of localization, I question the benefit. Your willingness to experiment is a good ingredient. | ||