Understanding ToneMatch® presets - Revision history

ST: ST moved page Understanding ToneMatchâ„¢ presets to Understanding ToneMatch® presets

2017-03-26T21:07:44Z

ST moved page Understanding ToneMatchâ„¢ presets to Understanding ToneMatch® presets

← Older revision	Revision as of 21:07, 26 March 2017
(No difference)

ST: Category:Bose L1® Musicians Conference Fall 2006

2008-12-22T19:08:59Z

Category:Bose L1® Musicians Conference Fall 2006

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:08, 22 December 2008
Line 4:		Line 4:


	[[:Category:Bose ~~L1™ Musicians Conference Fall 2006]]~~		[[Category:Bose L1® Musicians Conference Fall 2006]]





	~~[[category:Bose L1™~~ Musicians Conference Fall 2006]]

ST at 23:26, 22 August 2006

2006-08-22T23:26:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:26, 22 August 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Content moved to the [[Bose L1™ ~~Owners~~ Conference Fall 2006/Agenda\|conference agenda page]]		Content moved to the [[Bose L1™ Musicians Conference Fall 2006/Agenda\|conference agenda page]]

	Later (post-conference) we can use this page to publish the presentation notes. But during the development, I suggest we keep it all together.		Later (post-conference) we can use this page to publish the presentation notes. But during the development, I suggest we keep it all together.

ST: name changes for related

2006-08-22T23:25:43Z

name changes for related

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:25, 22 August 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:


	[[:Category:Bose L1™ ~~Owners~~ Conference Fall 2006]]		[[:Category:Bose L1™ Musicians Conference Fall 2006]]


Line 10:		Line 10:


	[[category:Bose L1™ ~~Owners~~ Conference Fall 2006]]		[[category:Bose L1™ Musicians Conference Fall 2006]]

ST at 21:23, 22 August 2006

2006-08-22T21:23:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:23, 22 August 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Content moved to conference agenda page		Content moved to the [[Bose L1™ Owners Conference Fall 2006/Agenda\|conference agenda page]]

	Later (post-conference) we can use this page to publish the presentation notes. But during the development, I suggest we keep it all together.		Later (post-conference) we can use this page to publish the presentation notes. But during the development, I suggest we keep it all together.

ST: category link added

2006-08-22T21:23:01Z

category link added

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:23, 22 August 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Later (post-conference) we can use this page to publish the presentation notes. But during the development, I suggest we keep it all together.		Later (post-conference) we can use this page to publish the presentation notes. But during the development, I suggest we keep it all together.


			[[:Category:Bose L1™ Owners Conference Fall 2006]]





	[[category:Bose L1™ Owners Conference Fall 2006]]		[[category:Bose L1™ Owners Conference Fall 2006]]

ST: moved content to conference agenda page

2006-08-22T21:15:16Z

moved content to conference agenda page

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:15, 22 August 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~[note: some text below taken from an email from ickler~~ to ~~jacob]~~		Content moved to conference agenda page

	Narrators in the [http://www.bose.com/controller?event=VIEW_STATIC_PAGE_EVENT&url=/musicians/tonematch.jsp Taylor/Bose video] are having some difficulty explaining the ToneMatch™ concept simply, so the video tries to solve that problem by providing multiple explanations and by conveying the enthusiasm of the people involved instead.

	~~Chris Ickler has some ideas on how to talk about this at the Fall L1 Owners Conference and maybe that will lead to a shorter, more accurate message about ToneMatch technology.~~

	~~(ickler text follows)~~

	Nobody can ToneMatch a system that doesn’t have uniform coverage. (It’s like trying to impose a house curve on an installed system that has spotty coverage.) Certainly no triple system has uniform coverage. Even if you decided to ToneMatch every instrument through every speaker of a triple system, you would have to nail the performers’ shoes to the floor and the audience would have to take turns standing in the "ToneMatched" sweet spot of the FOH system. ToneMatch technology only has audible benefit AFTER you solve the coverage problem.

	* So the first problem of amplified music is to get the same tone everywhere. The L1 is the solution.
	* The second problem of amplified music is to get the right tone everywhere. ToneMatch is the solution.
	* No one can deliver the second solution before they deliver the first solution.


			Later (post-conference) we can use this page to publish the presentation notes. But during the development, I suggest we keep it all together.


	[[category:Bose L1™ Owners Conference Fall 2006]]		[[category:Bose L1™ Owners Conference Fall 2006]]

ST: category added

2006-08-22T21:13:20Z

category added

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:13, 22 August 2006
Line 12:		Line 12:
	* The second problem of amplified music is to get the right tone everywhere. ToneMatch is the solution.		* The second problem of amplified music is to get the right tone everywhere. ToneMatch is the solution.
	* No one can deliver the second solution before they deliver the first solution.		* No one can deliver the second solution before they deliver the first solution.




			[[category:Bose L1™ Owners Conference Fall 2006]]

Kjacob at 20:20, 22 August 2006

2006-08-22T20:20:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:20, 22 August 2006
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Chris Ickler has some ideas on how to talk about this at the Fall L1 Owners Conference and maybe that will lead to a shorter, more accurate message about ToneMatch technology.		Chris Ickler has some ideas on how to talk about this at the Fall L1 Owners Conference and maybe that will lead to a shorter, more accurate message about ToneMatch technology.

	"Nobody can ToneMatch a system that doesn’t have uniform coverage. (It’s like trying to impose a house curve on an installed system that has spotty coverage.) Certainly no triple system has uniform coverage. Even if you decided to ToneMatch every instrument through every speaker of a triple system, you would have to nail the performers’ shoes to the floor and the audience would have to take turns standing in the "ToneMatched" sweet spot of the FOH system. ToneMatch technology only has audible benefit AFTER you solve the coverage problem.		(ickler text follows)

			Nobody can ToneMatch a system that doesn’t have uniform coverage. (It’s like trying to impose a house curve on an installed system that has spotty coverage.) Certainly no triple system has uniform coverage. Even if you decided to ToneMatch every instrument through every speaker of a triple system, you would have to nail the performers’ shoes to the floor and the audience would have to take turns standing in the "ToneMatched" sweet spot of the FOH system. ToneMatch technology only has audible benefit AFTER you solve the coverage problem.

	* So the first problem of amplified music is to get the same tone everywhere. The L1 is the solution.		* So the first problem of amplified music is to get the same tone everywhere. The L1 is the solution.
	* The second problem of amplified music is to get the right tone everywhere. ToneMatch is the solution.		* The second problem of amplified music is to get the right tone everywhere. ToneMatch is the solution.
	* No one can deliver the second solution before they deliver the first solution."		* No one can deliver the second solution before they deliver the first solution.

Kjacob at 20:19, 22 August 2006

2006-08-22T20:19:52Z

New page

[note: some text below taken from an email from ickler to jacob]

Narrators in the [http://www.bose.com/controller?event=VIEW_STATIC_PAGE_EVENT&url=/musicians/tonematch.jsp Taylor/Bose video] are having some difficulty explaining the ToneMatch™ concept simply, so the video tries to solve that problem by providing multiple explanations and by conveying the enthusiasm of the people involved instead.

Chris Ickler has some ideas on how to talk about this at the Fall L1 Owners Conference and maybe that will lead to a shorter, more accurate message about ToneMatch technology.

"Nobody can ToneMatch a system that doesn’t have uniform coverage. (It’s like trying to impose a house curve on an installed system that has spotty coverage.) Certainly no triple system has uniform coverage. Even if you decided to ToneMatch every instrument through every speaker of a triple system, you would have to nail the performers’ shoes to the floor and the audience would have to take turns standing in the "ToneMatched" sweet spot of the FOH system. ToneMatch technology only has audible benefit AFTER you solve the coverage problem.

* So the first problem of amplified music is to get the same tone everywhere. The L1 is the solution.
* The second problem of amplified music is to get the right tone everywhere. ToneMatch is the solution.
* No one can deliver the second solution before they deliver the first solution."