EV RE-2 Wireless Microphone Review - Revision history

ST at 18:24, 11 March 2020

2020-03-11T18:24:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:24, 11 March 2020
Line 50:		Line 50:

	==Documentation ==		==Documentation ==
	[[~~File~~:EV RE-2 User Guide.pdf]]		[[Media:EV RE-2 User Guide.pdf\|EV RE-2 User Guide]]

	----		----
Line 56:		Line 56:
	[[Category:Microphone]]		[[Category:Microphone]]

	[[Category:Wireless		[[Category:Wireless]]

ST at 18:20, 11 March 2020

2020-03-11T18:20:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:20, 11 March 2020
Line 49:		Line 49:
	2008-09-07		2008-09-07

			==Documentation ==
			[[File:EV RE-2 User Guide.pdf]]

	----		----
	[[Category:Review]]		[[Category:Review]]
	[[Category:Microphone]]		[[Category:Microphone]]

			[[Category:Wireless

Joelheck: /* What do I like about the product */ additional mics

2008-09-15T04:51:25Z

What do I like about the product: additional mics

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:51, 15 September 2008
Line 35:		Line 35:

	==What do I like about the product==		==What do I like about the product==
	I really liked the sound quality of the EV RE-2 system and the light comfortable feel of the wireless microphone itself. The battery life was excellent, with better than 8 hours performance.		I really liked the sound quality of the EV RE-2 system and the light comfortable feel of the wireless microphone itself. The battery life was excellent, with better than 8 hours performance. The responsiveness and clarity was equal to the wired version of the EV nd767a microphone. It has a nice proximity effect while eating the mic so to speak, that does not muddy up or get overly bassey sounding. I have a pair of wireless Nady UHF 10's, a Wireless Sure Headset (very thin sounding)and an SM58. I prefer these EV RE-2 microphones over any of them.

	==What I do not like about the product==		==What I do not like about the product==

Joelheck: picture placement

2008-09-10T05:22:46Z

picture placement

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:22, 10 September 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
			[[Image:ev767a.jpg\|right]] [[Image:evre2.jpg\|right]]
	==Review or Comparison of multiple products==		==Review or Comparison of multiple products==
	* Review of one product		* Review of one product
Line 6:		Line 7:
	MSRP: $690. Typical Street Price: $499.		MSRP: $690. Typical Street Price: $499.

	~~[[Image:ev767a.jpg]] [[Image:evre2.jpg]]~~

	==Features==		===Features===
	* RE-2 Receiver		* RE-2 Receiver
	* Frequency Agile		* Frequency Agile

Joelheck: picture

2008-09-10T05:07:43Z

picture

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:07, 10 September 2008
Line 6:		Line 6:
	MSRP: $690. Typical Street Price: $499.		MSRP: $690. Typical Street Price: $499.

	[[Image:~~ev767tr~~.jpg]] [[Image:evre2.jpg]]		[[Image:ev767a.jpg]] [[Image:evre2.jpg]]

	==Features==		==Features==

Joelheck: /* Identify the product - Make, Model, List Price, Typical Street Price */

2008-09-10T05:00:26Z

Identify the product - Make, Model, List Price, Typical Street Price

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:00, 10 September 2008
Line 6:		Line 6:
	MSRP: $690. Typical Street Price: $499.		MSRP: $690. Typical Street Price: $499.

	[[Image:ev767tr.jpg]]		[[Image:ev767tr.jpg]] [[Image:evre2.jpg]]

	==Features==		==Features==

Joelheck: picture

2008-09-10T04:53:38Z

picture

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:53, 10 September 2008
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Electro-Voice RE2-N7 Wireless System with EV 767a Dynamic Element		Electro-Voice RE2-N7 Wireless System with EV 767a Dynamic Element
	MSRP: $690. Typical Street Price: $499.		MSRP: $690. Typical Street Price: $499.

			[[Image:ev767tr.jpg]]

	==Features==		==Features==

DanCornett: fixed comma placements

2008-09-09T14:38:31Z

fixed comma placements

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:38, 9 September 2008
Line 42:		Line 42:

	==Review Summary==		==Review Summary==
	I've tried quite a few different microphones, both wired and wireless and this one is a definite keeper. I feel it has a reasonable price, value and quality to it.		I've tried quite a few different microphones, both wired and wireless, and this one is a definite keeper. I feel it has a reasonable price, value, and quality to it.

	==Review Date==		==Review Date==

DanCornett: removed extraneous comma

2008-09-09T14:37:37Z

removed extraneous comma

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:37, 9 September 2008
Line 30:		Line 30:

	==General Comment==		==General Comment==
	All the test listeners, commented on the clarity of each speaker and how well the singers sound projected to all areas.		All the test listeners commented on the clarity of each speaker and how well the singers sound projected to all areas.

	==What do I like about the product==		==What do I like about the product==

DanCornett: clarify that effects mute is on the T1, not the mic

2008-09-09T14:36:56Z

clarify that effects mute is on the T1, not the mic

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:36, 9 September 2008
Line 22:		Line 22:

	==Application==		==Application==
	We found it well suited to both Male and Female vocal applications. During announcements, pressing the appropriate channels effects mute button, allowed more than sufficient volume levels for announcements, without feedback issues.		We found it well suited to both Male and Female vocal applications. During announcements, pressing the appropriate channels effects mute button on the T1 allowed more than sufficient volume levels for announcements, without feedback issues.
	During most vocal applications, given the outdoor area and music style, a light amount of reverb, gave a nice enhancement to the vocal, with out feedback problems. Using moderate, compression, gave rise to a potential feedback problem at higher levels. Further testing later, gave the impression that there was not sufficient benefit with the compression, to warrant the feedback risk. This has been observed to a greater extent with other microphones, in this setting.		During most vocal applications, given the outdoor area and music style, a light amount of reverb, gave a nice enhancement to the vocal, with out feedback problems. Using moderate, compression, gave rise to a potential feedback problem at higher levels. Further testing later, gave the impression that there was not sufficient benefit with the compression, to warrant the feedback risk. This has been observed to a greater extent with other microphones, in this setting.