Bwiki - Revision history

ST at 00:33, 24 August 2006

2006-08-24T00:33:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:33, 24 August 2006
Line 27:		Line 27:
	* Has a "discussion" feature which is a less formal area where contributors can discuss individual articles. (Each page is basically an article).		* Has a "discussion" feature which is a less formal area where contributors can discuss individual articles. (Each page is basically an article).
	• This system does not have integrated features like blogs, forums as well as wikis. We may not need those other features.		• This system does not have integrated features like blogs, forums as well as wikis. We may not need those other features.
	~~[[category:bwiki]]~~

	==Now What==		==Now What==
Line 36:		Line 36:

	go to the [http://toonz.ca/wiki/ other wiki portal]		go to the [http://toonz.ca/wiki/ other wiki portal]

			[[category:[[category:The Bose L1™ Wiki Project]]]]

ST: spelling

2006-08-08T00:28:59Z

spelling

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:28, 8 August 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:
	I have installed and configured MediaWiki (same software as is used for Wikipedia). After a couple of days with it ...		I have installed and configured MediaWiki (same software as is used for Wikipedia). After a couple of days with it ...

	• I really like the appearance, although the unmistakable resemblance to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page Wikipedia ]has both good and bad connotations.		• I really like the appearance, although the unmistakable resemblance to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page Wikipedia] has both good and bad connotations.

	• Setting it up was harder than you would expect from the documentation. Different back end, scripting language and database than I prefer, but it<nowiki>’</nowiki>s all running now.		• Setting it up was harder than you would expect from the documentation. Different back end, scripting language and database than I prefer, but it<nowiki>’</nowiki>s all running now.
Line 11:		Line 11:

	<br><br><br>[http://toonz.ca/bwiki/index.php?title=Main_Page http://toonz.ca/bwiki/]<br><br>Let<nowiki>’</nowiki>s refer to it as the bwiki site for now.<br><br>		<br><br><br>[http://toonz.ca/bwiki/index.php?title=Main_Page http://toonz.ca/bwiki/]<br><br>Let<nowiki>’</nowiki>s refer to it as the bwiki site for now.<br><br>
	===~~Likes~~===		===Plus===

	* Looks good		* Looks good

	* The interface is familiar to anyone who uses Wikipedia		* The interface is familiar to anyone who uses Wikipedia

	===~~Dislikes / Concerns~~===		===Minus===
	* Editor (used for creating and changing content) is not WYSIWYM (What you see is what you meant)		* Editor (used for creating and changing content) is not WYSIWYM (What you see is what you meant)
	* I am less familiar with the underlying programming language (PHP) and Database (MySQL), than with the other wiki (.NET and SQL Server).		* I am less familiar with the underlying programming language (PHP) and Database (MySQL), than with the other wiki (.NET and SQL Server).
	* A few anomalies running under Windows/IIS. There is better if support if you are running Linux/Apache. I am running Windows/IIS.		* There are a few anomalies running under Windows/IIS. There is better support if you are running Linux/Apache. I am running Windows/IIS.
	* Documentation is sprawled over several sites (all related to WikiMedia, but all in transition).		* Documentation is sprawled over several sites (all related to WikiMedia, but all in transition).

Line 31:		Line 30:

	==Now What==		==Now What==
	You can take a look around. There isn't a lot here. Just ~~enought~~ for me to test that the system is working.		You can take a look around. There isn't a lot here. Just enough for me to test that the system is working.
	Click the logo at the top left to go to the [[Main Page]].		Click the logo at the top left to go to the [[Main Page]].

ST: links to home and other wiki

2006-08-07T14:28:32Z

links to home and other wiki

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:28, 7 August 2006
Line 29:		Line 29:
	• This system does not have integrated features like blogs, forums as well as wikis. We may not need those other features.		• This system does not have integrated features like blogs, forums as well as wikis. We may not need those other features.
	[[category:bwiki]]		[[category:bwiki]]

			==Now What==
			You can take a look around. There isn't a lot here. Just enought for me to test that the system is working.
			Click the logo at the top left to go to the [[Main Page]].

			or

			go to the [http://toonz.ca/wiki/ other wiki portal]

ST at 14:15, 7 August 2006

2006-08-07T14:15:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:15, 7 August 2006
Line 20:		Line 20:
	* Editor (used for creating and changing content) is not WYSIWYM (What you see is what you meant)		* Editor (used for creating and changing content) is not WYSIWYM (What you see is what you meant)
	* I am less familiar with the underlying programming language (PHP) and Database (MySQL), than with the other wiki (.NET and SQL Server).		* I am less familiar with the underlying programming language (PHP) and Database (MySQL), than with the other wiki (.NET and SQL Server).
	* A few anomalies running under Windows/IIS. There is better if support if you are running Linux/Apache.		* A few anomalies running under Windows/IIS. There is better if support if you are running Linux/Apache. I am running Windows/IIS.
	* Documentation is sprawled over several sites (all related to WikiMedia, but all in transition).		* Documentation is sprawled over several sites (all related to WikiMedia, but all in transition).

Line 26:		Line 26:
	* Strong resemblance to Wikipedia may inspire (unknown) responses		* Strong resemblance to Wikipedia may inspire (unknown) responses
	* Challenging Editor interface may deter frivolous contributions		* Challenging Editor interface may deter frivolous contributions
	* Has a "discussion" feature which is a less formal area where contributors can discuss individual articles. (Each page is basically ~~and~~ article).		* Has a "discussion" feature which is a less formal area where contributors can discuss individual articles. (Each page is basically an article).
	• This system does not have integrated features like blogs, forums as well as wikis. We may not need those other features.		• This system does not have integrated features like blogs, forums as well as wikis. We may not need those other features.
	[[category:bwiki]]		[[category:bwiki]]

ST: /* To b or not 2 b */

2006-08-07T14:12:50Z

To b or not 2 b

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:12, 7 August 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:
	• I really like the appearance, although the unmistakable resemblance to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page Wikipedia ]has both good and bad connotations.		• I really like the appearance, although the unmistakable resemblance to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page Wikipedia ]has both good and bad connotations.

	• Setting it up was ~~a bit of a chore~~. Different back end, scripting language and database than I prefer, but it<nowiki>’</nowiki>s all running now.		• Setting it up was harder than you would expect from the documentation. Different back end, scripting language and database than I prefer, but it<nowiki>’</nowiki>s all running now.

	• The real deal breaker may be the editor (that everyone who contributes or edits has to use)		• The real deal breaker may be the editor (that everyone who contributes or edits has to use)
Line 13:		Line 13:
	===Likes===		===Likes===

	• Looks good		* Looks good

	• The interface is familiar to anyone who uses Wikipedia		* The interface is familiar to anyone who uses Wikipedia

	===Dislikes / Concerns===		===Dislikes / Concerns===
			* Editor (used for creating and changing content) is not WYSIWYM (What you see is what you meant)
	• Editor (used for creating and changing content) is not WYSIWYM (What you see is what you meant)		* I am less familiar with the underlying programming language (PHP) and Database (MySQL), than with the other wiki (.NET and SQL Server).
			* A few anomalies running under Windows/IIS. There is better if support if you are running Linux/Apache.
	• I am less familiar with the underlying programming language (PHP) and Database (MySQL), than with the other wiki (.NET and SQL Server).		* Documentation is sprawled over several sites (all related to WikiMedia, but all in transition).

	===Interesting===		===Interesting===
			* Strong resemblance to Wikipedia may inspire (unknown) responses
	• Strong resemblance to Wikipedia may inspire (unknown) responses		* Challenging Editor interface may deter frivolous contributions
			* Has a "discussion" feature which is a less formal area where contributors can discuss individual articles. (Each page is basically and article).
	• Challenging Editor interface may deter frivolous contributions

	• Has a "discussion" feature which is a less formal area where contributors can discuss individual articles. (Each page is basically and article).

	• This system does not have integrated features like blogs, forums as well as wikis. We may not need those other features.		• This system does not have integrated features like blogs, forums as well as wikis. We may not need those other features.
	[[category:bwiki]]		[[category:bwiki]]

ST: /* Interesting */

2006-08-07T14:08:02Z

Interesting

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:08, 7 August 2006
Line 29:		Line 29:
	• Challenging Editor interface may deter frivolous contributions		• Challenging Editor interface may deter frivolous contributions

	• Has a "~~talk~~" feature which is a ~~discussion~~ area ~~for each~~ article		• Has a "discussion" feature which is a less formal area where contributors can discuss individual articles. (Each page is basically and article).

	• This system does not have integrated features like blogs, forums as well as wikis. We may not need those other features.		• This system does not have integrated features like blogs, forums as well as wikis. We may not need those other features.
	[[category:bwiki]]		[[category:bwiki]]

ST at 14:05, 7 August 2006

2006-08-07T14:05:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:05, 7 August 2006
Line 21:		Line 21:
	• Editor (used for creating and changing content) is not WYSIWYM (What you see is what you meant)		• Editor (used for creating and changing content) is not WYSIWYM (What you see is what you meant)

	• I am less familiar with the underlying programming language (PHP) and Database (MySQL), than ~~I am~~ with the ~~system you are looking at now~~ (.NET and SQL Server).		• I am less familiar with the underlying programming language (PHP) and Database (MySQL), than with the other wiki (.NET and SQL Server).

	===Interesting===		===Interesting===
Line 31:		Line 31:
	• Has a "talk" feature which is a discussion area for each article		• Has a "talk" feature which is a discussion area for each article

			• This system does not have integrated features like blogs, forums as well as wikis. We may not need those other features.
	[[category:bwiki]]		[[category:bwiki]]

ST at 14:02, 7 August 2006

2006-08-07T14:02:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:02, 7 August 2006
Line 10:		Line 10:
	• Readers get to enjoy the overall interface which is pretty good, but contributors have to learn a somewhat non-intuitive interface.		• Readers get to enjoy the overall interface which is pretty good, but contributors have to learn a somewhat non-intuitive interface.

	<br><br>~~Here is the MediaWiki version of the wiki site.~~<br>[http://toonz.ca/bwiki/index.php?title=Main_Page http://toonz.ca/bwiki/]<br><br>Let<nowiki>’</nowiki>s refer to it as the bwiki site for now.<br><br>		<br><br><br>[http://toonz.ca/bwiki/index.php?title=Main_Page http://toonz.ca/bwiki/]<br><br>Let<nowiki>’</nowiki>s refer to it as the bwiki site for now.<br><br>
	===Likes===		===Likes===

ST at 13:53, 7 August 2006

2006-08-07T13:53:27Z

New page

==To b or not 2 b==
I have installed and configured MediaWiki (same software as is used for Wikipedia). After a couple of days with it ...

• I really like the appearance, although the unmistakable resemblance to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page Wikipedia ]has both good and bad connotations.

• Setting it up was a bit of a chore. Different back end, scripting language and database than I prefer, but it<nowiki>’</nowiki>s all running now.

• The real deal breaker may be the editor (that everyone who contributes or edits has to use)

• Readers get to enjoy the overall interface which is pretty good, but contributors have to learn a somewhat non-intuitive interface.

 Here is the MediaWiki version of the wiki site. [http://toonz.ca/bwiki/index.php?title=Main_Page http://toonz.ca/bwiki/] Let<nowiki>’</nowiki>s refer to it as the bwiki site for now. 
===Likes===

• Looks good

• The interface is familiar to anyone who uses Wikipedia

===Dislikes / Concerns===

• Editor (used for creating and changing content) is not WYSIWYM (What you see is what you meant)

• I am less familiar with the underlying programming language (PHP) and Database (MySQL), than I am with the system you are looking at now (.NET and SQL Server).

===Interesting===

• Strong resemblance to Wikipedia may inspire (unknown) responses

• Challenging Editor interface may deter frivolous contributions

• Has a "talk" feature which is a discussion area for each article

[[category:bwiki]]